Groaning Discontent On Sai Porn
Gerald Moreno - my favourite sex-obsessed critic and online stalker - has repeatedly made a big hoo-ha over my posting of pornographic pictures on this blog, which includes a drawing of Sai Baba receiving oral sex from a young lad. After Gerald decided to take revenge on behalf of Sai Baba and was chided by an observer, he proceeded to state the following in justification for his actions:
Lovely chap, eh? And approximately 45 minutes later, Gerald stated:
Someone needs a glass of cool water. And even after I explained in the original blog and in a later piece that the image(s) in question had been sent to me and that I had posted them in the mood of comic relief, it appears that tempers are still not appeased. Approximately two and a half months later (February 2006), Gerald stated the following on his website in the midst of savagely criticising yet another anti-Sai activist:
So even after I had produced adequate explanations that was more than anyone deserved, it looks like there's no stopping the Duracell bunnies once they get going eh?
To get some perspective, let's take a look at this shocking and blatantly offensive picture that has caused such endless consternation:
As a matter of fact, the story behind this picture is an interesting one. I originally posted this picture with a tongue-in-cheek comment about it being evidence that Sai Baba sexually abuses young boys. At the time of writing, the picture is still available on the Net although it is not accessible through the main website.
Employing an exhaustive Google Image search, I discovered that the drawing was originally created by Drew Ross, who owns a website that displays his own artwork and claims to have created the Sai Baba image way back in May 2002. Ross explains his intentions: "So like this Sai Baba guy who's 'orange toga n' superfro' look used to adorn the walls of every single new age commune I ever stepped foot in as a kid is now an exposed homosexual pedophile, when i found out, I drew dis pictoor and thot it was kinna funny."
Yes, I thot it was kinna funny too, although I acknowledge that the image I posted is significantly different in the sense of colouring in Sai Baba's robe. Hardly a massive objection.
Is any of this pornographic, though? I'll grant that it has something of a shock value but I think it is unreasonable to blame or crucify me for posting pictures that have been in the public domain for nearly three years. That aside, I found the following Wikipedia statement interesting:
I'd hardly class this drawing as child pornography per se, although I'm sure that there are lots of embittered Sai-defenders who'd love to accuse me of it just for kicks. At the end of the day there is no reason whatsoever to make a hue and cry about pornography and Sai Baba. This meaningless charade exposes Gerald Moreno as a screaming yahoo who is hung out to dry for exhibiting the same behaviour that I observed several months ago:
"Sanjay ... duplicated an image of a child giving SSB oral sex under his robe! Yet YOU have the audacity to point your pudgy fingers at me and say I am 'tasteless'. Crawl back under your rock from which you slithered out, [Observer]."
Lovely chap, eh? And approximately 45 minutes later, Gerald stated:
"[Observer] thinks it is 100% OKAY for Dadlani to duplicate an image of Sathya Sai Baba receiving ORAL SEX from a child, under his robe, stating 'I'll make this one Sari. I came!' Yet [Observer] has the audacity to point his pudgy fingers at me for duplicating images that are NOWHERE even close to that!"
Someone needs a glass of cool water. And even after I explained in the original blog and in a later piece that the image(s) in question had been sent to me and that I had posted them in the mood of comic relief, it appears that tempers are still not appeased. Approximately two and a half months later (February 2006), Gerald stated the following on his website in the midst of savagely criticising yet another anti-Sai activist:
"[Activist] bit his tongue when his friends Reinier Van Der Sandt and Sanjay Dadlani posted images, of a pornographic kind, against SSB (one even depicting him receiving oral sex from a child underneath his robe)!"
So even after I had produced adequate explanations that was more than anyone deserved, it looks like there's no stopping the Duracell bunnies once they get going eh?
To get some perspective, let's take a look at this shocking and blatantly offensive picture that has caused such endless consternation:
Whew! Does this look like pornography to you?
As a matter of fact, the story behind this picture is an interesting one. I originally posted this picture with a tongue-in-cheek comment about it being evidence that Sai Baba sexually abuses young boys. At the time of writing, the picture is still available on the Net although it is not accessible through the main website.
Employing an exhaustive Google Image search, I discovered that the drawing was originally created by Drew Ross, who owns a website that displays his own artwork and claims to have created the Sai Baba image way back in May 2002. Ross explains his intentions: "So like this Sai Baba guy who's 'orange toga n' superfro' look used to adorn the walls of every single new age commune I ever stepped foot in as a kid is now an exposed homosexual pedophile, when i found out, I drew dis pictoor and thot it was kinna funny."
Yes, I thot it was kinna funny too, although I acknowledge that the image I posted is significantly different in the sense of colouring in Sai Baba's robe. Hardly a massive objection.
Is any of this pornographic, though? I'll grant that it has something of a shock value but I think it is unreasonable to blame or crucify me for posting pictures that have been in the public domain for nearly three years. That aside, I found the following Wikipedia statement interesting:
"..Most importantly, unlike the real type, cartoon child pornography is legal, so long as no real children have been used as models."
I'd hardly class this drawing as child pornography per se, although I'm sure that there are lots of embittered Sai-defenders who'd love to accuse me of it just for kicks. At the end of the day there is no reason whatsoever to make a hue and cry about pornography and Sai Baba. This meaningless charade exposes Gerald Moreno as a screaming yahoo who is hung out to dry for exhibiting the same behaviour that I observed several months ago:
"These types of silly distractions are typical of the pro-SB clan who seek to stir up these types of complete non-issues in order to create a smokescreen and an exhibition of their showmanship in order to distract people away from discussing the real topic at hand: Sai Baba and his activities!"
Copyright © Sai Baba EXPOSED! 2005-2007. Discuss this post!
posted by Swami Saiexposedananda at
18:08
Return To Main Page
1 Comments:
DUPLICITY BY GERALDO, the clown of the
cyber-ring!
He says he 'duplicated' pictures.. but he did not, he made the up himself by blending a personal photograph of Sanjay Dadlani with vile bodies etc. It is against US law to post pictures of people who own the copyright to them without their consent!
By
Anonymous, at 22 February, 2006 22:56
Post a Comment
<< Home